Simon Crust
Editorial Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 4,477
- Reaction score
- 3,013
- Points
- 2,581
To be fair, the total score divided by 5 categories is 7.4 so mathematically the overall score is sound. At the end of the day, some people will buy this just for the reference quality picture and sound. Other people (myself included) wouldn't dream of buying any film for that reason alone, and so the movie score is all I really need to see.8, say what???, if you movie was only 5 I cant help feeling that a great picture and sound can only add 1 or two points to an overall figure, if the movie is so bad it only gets a 5 I dont think its fair for it to get an 8 overall regardless off the rest.
Cant wait for your Cats review....
60fps just leaves it not looking like a film... I'm all for 4k, HDR, DV, HDR10+, however, it just looks unnatural...
Turned it off halfway through, far too distracting for me.
60fps just leaves it not looking like a film... I'm all for 4k, HDR, DV, HDR10+, however, it just looks unnatural...
60fps just leaves it not looking like a film... I'm all for 4k, HDR, DV, HDR10+, however, it just looks unnatural...
Turned it off halfway through, far too distracting for me.
Real life isn't juddery. 24fps was chosen because it was the minimum rate for believable motion when celluloid was prohibitively expensive. It wasn't chosen for any artistic reason.
In time 60fps and higher will be completly standard.
Yes it is,you try running fast and keeping everything around you in exact motion,plus movie are not always about seeing things in real life,director have artistic reason.
It's a bit like saying Vincent Van Gogh painting did not look like real life,in his time,but in time,everybody will be painted in real life.
Or when they upgraded Saving Private Ryan,lets cut out all those blurry scenes on the beach,thats not like real life.
And cinematographer don't DOF,or long telephoto and wide angle lens,as it not real life