Each time yet another accusation appeared I contacted the accuser commiserating with them at the heinous nature of such an event and asked for sight of the evidence supporting their accusation stating that anti-Semitism is a crime and the Police should be informed. I never received a single reply.
1. MP [email protected] Sent: 22 February 2019 11:56 Subject: Evidence of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party?
I have not led a sheltered life having worked in the building trade, the Army and a car factory. Apart from one example as a boy I have never come across anti-Semitism in any form so could you please share the evidence of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party with me that you claim knowledge off. Not even an acknowledgement.
2. MP [email protected] On 04/04/2019 15:13, Subject: Evidence of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party?
Dear Brian L, Thank you for your most recent correspondence to my office, where I note your concerns around the issue of antisemitism and I would be more than happy to help in my capacity as MP for ??????????. However, to my knowledge, the email that you have sent to my office does not detail whether or not you are a constituent of ?????????. Due to strict parliamentary protocol, Members of Parliament are only permitted to make representations on behalf of their own constituents. If you are not a resident of the ??????????? constituency, I would advise you to contact your own MP. You can find out who they are here: WriteToThem I would be very grateful if you could provide me with your full name, address and postcode, so I may progress this issue on your behalf. Yours sincerely, ?????????? A cop out.
3. MP [email protected] Subject anti-Semitism accusation
“When I went to Auschwitz I rather complacently said to myself, ‘thank goodness we don’t have to worry about that kind of thing happening in the UK’ and now I find myself faced with the leader of the Labour Party who has opened the door to antisemitism in a way that is truly frightening.”
Would you care to offer evidence for your accusation? Brian L Not even an acknowledgement.
I've used ignore ( only second time in 15 years). No point going over stuff when he's clearly not here to do anything other than insist everyone else is wrong. Even when I vehemently disagree with someone on here i can normally see the reasons behind their feelings/ beliefs so I'm happy to either learn or understand. But the conspiracy driven left are so dogmatic and blind to any other opinion it's just mind numbing. To get an election defeat like that and still can't admit that something wasn't right and everyone else is wrong beggars belief.I would think that under writing reasoning and associated risk calculations are commercially sensitive. No surprise they wouldn’t want it to go into the public domain. There seems to be a conspiracy everywhere with you @Brian L
What she did had nothing to do with getting the sack by someone who see's himself as a later day Clement Attlee. However, it did allow himself to show that he is very willing to acquiesce to the dictates of the zionist lobby before they even asked.
To me that comes across like Labour still has a problem with some of its hard core supporters. Luckily the majority has moved on and there is no more space for the likes of you.
@IronGiant this needs fact checking, as I have found no evidence to corroborate this statement...!!!.....If one looks at the statistics of vehicle drivers risk by age the contradictions between age 18 to 22 and age 80 to 82 are fascinating.....
Lol I used to work with people like that. Made me smile remembering.@Brian L
Your posts remind me of the old 1960s/1970s where a shop steward could stop work in a factory and demand everybody out on strike.
"Right then Brothers, down tools and all out. An apprentice has changed a fuse in a kettle lead plug which contravenes demarcation working practices".
Ah, those were the days...
Because there is clearly nothing there other than in your imagination.Remarkable, not a single mention was made in your comments as to an insurance company making a decision on the bigoted basis of ageism which had nothing to do with commercially sensitive risk calculations they wouldn’t want to go into the public domain.
I’ve sufficient knowledge of the actuarial profession to be aware that these so called commercially sensitive risk calculations are known to all insurance organisations.
Brian L said:I have not led a sheltered life having worked in the building trade, the Army and a car factory.
Lol I used to work with people like that. Made me smile remembering.
It's was always a crazy discussion with them, the verbal equivalent of this.
Sometimes you need to get back on your horse move on and leave them ranting
Well this certainly escalated quickly:
Keir Starmer: EHRC antisemitism report is day of shame for Labour
Leader keeps open possibility of disciplinary action against predecessor Jeremy Corbynwww.theguardian.com
Labour suspends Jeremy Corbyn over reaction to anti-Semitism report
Sir Keir Starmer acts after his predecessor says the scale of the problem within the party has been "overstated".www.bbc.co.uk
Definitely the correct decision - hopefully shows that the party may be turning a corner on this. Shameful stuff from Corbyn.
Dear Gary,
This morning, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) published their report into Antisemitism in the Labour Party.
The report, which we would urge you to read in full, can be found here.
We want to thank the EHRC for all of their work in the last year and a half, and the Labour Party staff who have worked tirelessly and constructively with the Commission's investigation.
The report's conclusions are clear and stark. The Commission has found that the Labour Party has breached the Equality Act in terms of unlawful harassment and indirect discrimination towards the Jewish community.
This is a day of shame for the Labour Party. We have failed the Jewish community, our members, our supporters and the British people. That is why, on behalf of the Labour Party, We want to apologise for all of the pain and grief that has been caused to the Jewish community these past few years.
It is also why we want to make this promise that we will act. Never again will Labour fail to tackle the poison of antisemitism or will we lose the trust of the Jewish community.
We accept the Commission's report in full and we will implement all of the recommendations in full, and we have already instructed staff to start taking this work forward.
But, we must go further. We need to change the Labour Party's culture.
It is on all us to make sure that the Labour Party is, once again, an open and welcoming place for people from all backgrounds and all communities.
Under our leadership, zero-tolerance of antisemitism will mean precisely that. There can be no more denials and no more excuses.
We will repair the breach and we will restore trust. We know it will take time and hard work, but we will do it. That is our mission and it is the commitment we made when we were elected.
We will only consider it a success when those members who left our Party because of antisemitism feel safe to return and when we no longer see the words "Labour" and "antisemitism" in the same sentence.
As a party member, I hope we can count on your support in implementing the EHRC's recommendations over coming weeks and months. If at any time you have any questions please send them to [email protected].
Keir Starmer
Leader of the Labour Party
I utterly reject that there is acknowledged Antisemitism in the Labour Party. If there is then please offer some actual evidence of it rather than the slurs used to attack Corbyn.