We are, we managed to get an interview, ask the question and get an answer many on the forums have been asking. You now know the reasoning from their point of view.Source: AVForums interview with LG /Dolby
Image Source: Dolby
If Prime uses HDR10+ then I want my £1500 TV to support HDR10+
Come on AVF - get behind us consumers
Meanwhile just buy a Panasonic GZ and cover all basesDolby Vision is clearly going to win the war vs HDR10+ IMO.
Possibly because DV was available and mature some years ago - HDR10+ was late to the Race.I don't get why is everybody so willing to fill Dolbys pockets when there is an open standard that will provide the same experience in most cases.
I guess AV Forums is not the New York Times or BBC. They can’t put ten people on the story for a month. I personally had never seen LG so publicly upfront about their decision to avoid the format so it was worthwhile to me.
Well we will have to agree to disagree. The site is managed by few people doing a lot of things. They brought to us the relevant information as to why LG were not interested in applying the format. It is unlikely it could ever be a major piece with input from various other parties. Given it is presented free here no complaints from me. I got what I needed to know.LG seem to have a viable alternative initiated years ago; that has be enriched over various iterations. It does not take ten people, it only takes one with some critical thinking to explore and ask a few questions and then to present the findings/references/examples in a coherent manner. Basic undergrad analysis not carried out.
I agree with you. I am sure as well that to keep access to all the people / gear / presentations, it is a diplomatic dance; speaking the truth about things without putting any Companies' nose so out of joint or pressing a point so hard that they get "cut off".Well we will have to agree to disagree. The site is managed by few people doing a lot of things. They brought to us the relevant information as to why LG were not interested in applying the format. It is unlikely it could ever be a major piece with input from various other parties. Given it is presented free here no complaints from me. I got what I needed to know.
maybe....... but in those early HDR days none of the TVs really supported any format. The list of unmet requirements was quite longer then the other one for both formats. And HDR 10+ came out pretty soon after that, still before TV were really ready for HDR in any form. Add to that a bunch of DV problems on many equipment...... And yet they always go for some proprietary licensed stuff instead of free open standards.Possibly because DV was available and mature some years ago - HDR10+ was late to the Race.