Thing is, even if you just watch movies, how on earth can an extra £1900 over a 65" LG CX be worth it?
The HZ1000 also has the same excellent bit starved processing at £1600 less.....
Is there any difference in performance between this and the GZ2000, as it reads like the same tv apart from the name.
Not even updated the speaker system, feels like they treading water with this release.
Without 2.1 wouldn't it be better to try and buy last years model and save yourself some money?
I do totally agree. I got a 65HZ2000 and I am extremely happy for its performance, and also happy to pay for that extra that actually makes the difference.Sometimes you have to pay for all the extra work it takes to squeeze out every bit of performance out of these OLED panels
You will never put a CX next to the HZ2000 and go 'hmm yes I see £1600 difference'. You are paying for the extra engineering it takes to get an OLED to perform to this level
Sometimes you have to pay for all the extra work it takes to squeeze out every bit of performance out of these OLED panels
You will never put a CX next to the HZ2000 and go 'hmm yes I see £1600 difference'. You are paying for the extra engineering it takes to get an OLED to perform to this level
As far as I remember, the Gz2000 had the same launch price as the Hz2000. I don't remember the Gz2000 being 5k at any time in the UK.New OLED 2020 Panel with variable 120hrtz BFI.
Dobly vision IQ
Filmaker mode with ambient sensor
Slight picture refinement
New menu look
If you don't need these then yes if you can get a GZ2000 go for it!
The 65GZ2000 was released at £5k last year. This is being released at £4.3k
I came from a 65GZ2000, and one of the important improvements to me implemented in HZ2000 is more details in dark scenes. And yes there is differences to other OLED TV sets, when it comes to the picture quality, and even the sound. I do not (anymore), wants a 5.1 surround system. So the sound solution in both GZ2000 and HZ2000 is just great for me.As far as I remember, the Gz2000 had the same launch price as the Hz2000. I don't remember the Gz2000 being 5k at any time in the UK.
I remember buying my gz2000 for 4.3k then a week later it dropping to 3.5k which I got currys to refund 800.
Other than BFI there wont be much difference, filmaker mode is nothing to write home about.
Hz2000 will be a stunning tv but not much better vs other sets around,and in some instances it will be inferior to the latest sets
Thing is, even if you just watch movies, how on earth can an extra £1900 over a 65" LG CX be worth it?
The HZ1000 also has the same excellent bit starved processing at £1600 less.....
Probably just as good too.SRP price, wow!
You could buy a LG 65" and a 55" OLED for that money.
Nope. There are not only 3D projectors but you can also watch 3D blu-rays with VR. In both cases you get a screen much bigger than the largest TV.Great review Phil.
Still happy with my LG 55" C6 as I play the occasional 3D blu ray. Starting to come to terms with the fact that once this TV dies then I will have to live without 3D.
I'm just relieved that I'm one of those people who doesn't really notice a difference in OLED picture quality. I've yet to see this in action, but I saw a GZ2000 and it looked the same as the competitors to my ageing eyes. Rival OLEDs from Sony and LG looked pretty much identical for picture quality.
£1600 more than the LG CX..(?) Utter madness. Each to their own i guess...
This model should have 4x hdmi 2.1 and full support for that standard.
This way is not future proof at all.