Gaslight
Prominent Member
The Mod IronGiant pointed this out to you that you have mixed me up
I'm out of here, too many foil hats for my liking!
Yes, he got it wrong.
Thank god!
The Mod IronGiant pointed this out to you that you have mixed me up
I'm out of here, too many foil hats for my liking!
Then why spend all day Sunday vigorously defending Field's actions? None of us would be posting here if we didn't think some aspect of this case was important.nuffin to analyse nor winge about.
If you watch all of the videos and photos then it is "common sense" there was no threat in that room
Then why spend all day Sunday vigorously defending Field's actions? None of us would be posting here if we didn't think some aspect of this case was important.
The videos and photos are recorded hindsight.
If you want to see a potential threat, what about the male protester that gets within 5 metres of our Chancellor? The Chancellor doesn't move away and no one appears that bothered apart from his speech is being interrupted.
The protestors entered the room. Hooked a horn and said "Greenpeace! This is a climate change emergency!". The Chancellor suppressed a smile. A male protestor approaching him was contained. Janet started her approach on the other side of the table. Mark Field kicked off.So again, you're telling me that in the immediacy of the situation, you'd be able to process the woman's choice of clothing and deduce from that, there was no threat?
He literally dosent understand the psychology involved in the concept of hindsight. I think the info will never find their space in the brain cells.
They are an evidential record. Hindsight is opinion based!The videos and photos are recorded hindsight.
You are comparing a peaceful Greenpeace protest
So only a male can be a potential threat?
You contradict yourself in that you admit he was a potential threat... but it's okay nobody intervened?
You're painting yourself into a corner.
I'm out of here, too many foil hats for my liking!
Are you talking about me or the other person who you think also lives in Bristol?
We have these things called eyes, ears and a brain, that allows us to see the same as what was being recorded in real time, and to process the information.
I'm saying the male close wasn't a threat, no one else in the room saw the protest as a threat, because there was no threat. It's not complex.
You're back already?
Someone else lives in Bristol?
Yes your last paragraph is correct, but you have been basing your argument on hindsight. Again , you've gotten confused as you've now flipped between foresight and hindsight. It's like a big bundle of socialist passive aggressive minority report confuddlement.
The protestors entered the room. Hooked a horn and said "Greenpeace! This is a climate change emergency!". The Chancellor suppressed a smile. A male protestor approaching him was contained. Janet started her approach on the other side of the table. Mark Field kicked off.
I don't think anyone needed super human skills to determine that there was no need to grab a protestor by the neck.
Well, at least the majority of the newspapers agree with my opinion, together with our dear prime minister, so at least I don't feel alone
We have these things called eyes, ears and a brain, that allows us to see the same as what was being recorded in real time, and to process the information.
I'm saying the male close wasn't a threat
If you want to see a potential threat, what about the male protester that gets within 5 metres of our Chancellor
He wasn't a threat... but he was a potential threat.
Game over man...
Yes, he got it wrong.
Thank god!
Well, at least the majority of the newspapers agree with my opinion, together with our dear prime minister, so at least I don't feel alone
As I said he wasn't a threat. A potential threat due to location, but not actually a threat because everyone in the room knew what was going on with the (peaceful) protest.
I have read the thread and you appear to have accused Bristol chaps of introducing the Boris incident.
If you can demonstrate why that has been read incorrectly it is you that needs to explain it. Before I escort you off the thread
I'll not post any more here BTW