Samsung has supported Dolby Vision passthrough for the last two years, which reflects a pragmatic approach on the part of Samsung when it comes to its soundbars (unlike LG). However I agree with your assessment of the future of HDR10+, with Dolby Vision completely dominating at this point.I'm pretty surprised it supports Dolby Vision passthrough. I think that means Samsung have acknowledged that HDR10+ is a dead format. The HDR10+ consortium website hasn't had an update since the start of the year, 2 of the 3 original backers have given up on the format, leaving only Samsung, who don't produce any content, supporting it. I think we can say now that only HDR and Dolby Vison matter and Samsungs HDR10+ battle with Dolby is over.
Well spotted, I meant to say lossy not lossless.Hi Steve,
I think I am getting confused when you say "The inclusion of eARC mitigates the single HDMI input to a degree, although if your TV doesn't support eARC, the audio sent back from the TV will still be lossless." I thought it was only eARC that transmitted lossless audio. I of course may be mixed up.
Thanks for the review, does look like a model refresh/re-name, can't quite get my head around Samsung's naming convention.
On the other hand although this model doesn't necessitate a need for an upgrade, this will certainly suit those moving to the model for the first time.
I am surprised that there isn't the option to buy the up-firing rears (although I know that you can still buy rears for a 5.1.2) in the future. Some may change home or just room and find that they could accomodate the full package, or indeed visit a friend with the full package and want to upgrade.
The scenario that I think a set up like this best suits is when the choice is made to watch and listen to TV across the width of the room rather than the length. That helps with immersion.
Personally I am looking for the 7.1.4 set up, as I can't resist having the full on "bubble" effect.
Look forward to your reviews of the LG SN11 and the Samsung Q900 packages.
Thanks again
Gordon
In fairness, those two products together originally cost a lot more than £799.Annoying and surprising to see the Sub spec is subpar compared to the SWA700, sticking point for me upgrading from MS650 and SWA700. RMS output is equally lower (Watts)
Samsung has supported Dolby Vision passthrough for the last two years, which reflects a pragmatic approach on the part of Samsung when it comes to its soundbars (unlike LG). However I agree with your assessment of the future of HDR10+, with Dolby Vision completely dominating at this point.
As I said in the post you quote, Samsung has been supporting Dolby Vision passthrough on its soundbars for two years, so this is nothing new. I guess adding Dolby Vision passthrough to the HDMI ports on a soundbar that already supports Dolby Atmos is more straightforward than adding Dolby Vision to TVs that don't support either (although they do pass Atmos back via HDMI-ARC on supporting apps).I agree, I just find it really odd that Samsung has decided to licence and support DV on a mid high range soundbar, but none of their other products, including their previous soundbars, and their new 2020 TVs don't support it.
I think the issue Steve, is that the top of the range Q950T will almost certainly use the same sub which is clearly inferior to what was once sold. The SWA700 is a fantastic sub, they should have extended its use to other ranges for those that invested in it. It’s enough of a deal breaker to prevent investment in the top end of the newer ranges. I guess we will have to see what spec comes out.In fairness, those two products together originally cost a lot more than £799.
The soundbar market is brutally competitive, so I suspect it ultimately comes down to cost.I think the issue Steve, is that the top of the range Q950T will almost certainly use the same sub which is clearly inferior to what was once sold. The SWA700 is a fantastic sub, they should have extended its use to other ranges for those that invested in it. It’s enough of a deal breaker to prevent investment in the top end of the newer ranges. I guess we will have to see what spec comes out.
I think the issue Steve, is that the top of the range Q950T will almost certainly use the same sub which is clearly inferior to what was once sold. The SWA700 is a fantastic sub, they should have extended its use to other ranges for those that invested in it. It’s enough of a deal breaker to prevent investment in the top end of the newer ranges. I guess we will have to see what spec comes out.
I think the issue Steve, is that the top of the range Q950T will almost certainly use the same sub which is clearly inferior to what was once sold. The SWA700 is a fantastic sub, they should have extended its use to other ranges for those that invested in it. It’s enough of a deal breaker to prevent investment in the top end of the newer ranges. I guess we will have to see what spec comes out.
I've also got my eye fixed on the Q950T, what you write does not bode well for the lower frequencies of that set, could you please elaborate a bit? Is the accompanied sub no good?
Samsung has supported Dolby Vision passthrough for the last two years, which reflects a pragmatic approach on the part of Samsung when it comes to its soundbars (unlike LG). However I agree with your assessment of the future of HDR10+, with Dolby Vision completely dominating at this point.
As I said in the post you quote, Samsung has been supporting Dolby Vision passthrough on its soundbars for two years, so this is nothing new. I guess adding Dolby Vision passthrough to the HDMI ports on a soundbar that already supports Dolby Atmos is more straightforward than adding Dolby Vision to TVs that don't support either (although they do pass Atmos back via HDMI-ARC on supporting apps).