D
Deleted member 27989
Guest
It’s non statutory guidance, so it could depend on the venue.How many people per table are supposed to be allowed inside a pub/restaurant?
It’s non statutory guidance, so it could depend on the venue.How many people per table are supposed to be allowed inside a pub/restaurant?
No they don't have to.Im in a local pub/ restaurant. Are the people working here supposed to wear masks? No one is.
How many people per table are supposed to be allowed inside a pub/restaurant?
I would have thought some regulations would have been followed. I want to support the local businesses but not get COVID in the process. Just seemed funny the staff walking around with no masks but looks like it’s up to them.If you concerned, why go in the first place?
I would have thought some regulations would have been followed. I want to support the local businesses but not get COVID in the process. Just seemed funny the staff walking around with no masks but looks like it’s up to them.
Bear in mind that the masks or face coverings that people are likely to have access to, do not prevent the wearer catching the virus. They are helpful in preventing the wearer from passing on the infection, if the wearer is themselves carrying the virus. As you can catch the virus through membranes in the eyes, only a visor would be beneficial (along with a N95 mask).There does seem to be some confusion about staff wearing PPE, wherever its a shop, a bar or restaurant etc. I've not been in the later two, but no staff seem to be wearing them in the food shops I've been into. I think they should, if only as some form of protection for their staff, to bolster the social distancing measures.
Bear in mind that the masks or face coverings that people are likely to have access to, do not prevent the wearer catching the virus. They are helpful in preventing the wearer from passing on the infection, if the wearer is themselves carrying the virus. As you can catch the virus through membranes in the eyes, only a visor would be beneficial (along with a N95 mask).
This is why it needs everybody to comply. If everybody does, the virus will start to die out as it runs out of people to infect. Same with social distancing at home, although we know how quickly people got bored with that!
Haven't anything to link but I think that advice has changed recently.Bear in mind that the masks or face coverings that people are likely to have access to, do not prevent the wearer catching the virus. They are helpful in preventing the wearer from passing on the infection, if the wearer is themselves carrying the virus. As you can catch the virus through membranes in the eyes, only a visor would be beneficial (along with a N95 mask).
Round them up and kick them out back to the UK, no tolerance. Bunch of muppets.
Ideally yes, I tried to remain reasonable and not let them be a burden to other countries. Perhaps apply similar travel restrictions on them like what was done for football hooligans.Screw that! We don't want them back! Round them up and dump them in the sea.
They already did! In my home town of Bournemouth where 500k idiots came down during the heatwave, there was a lot of drunks and fights and leaving their faeces in burger boxes on the beach... and all bars were closed then. Also more trouble further down coast at Durdle Door.They’re probably do the same here, given the chance.
One youngster would have died except a paddleboarder was nearby and saw he didn't surface.Also more trouble further down coast at Durdle Door.
They already did! In my home town of Bournemouth where 500k idiots came down during the heatwave, there was a lot of drunks and fights and leaving their faeces in burger boxes on the beach... and all bars were closed then. Also more trouble further down coast at Durdle Door.
Wouldn’t be the first time that Shagaluf has been full of superspreaders!This was a problem long before CoVid 19.
Unfortunately, being drunk and disorderly is some people's idea of having a good time.
Wouldn’t be the first time that Shagaluf has been full of superspreaders!