maverick177uk
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2004
- Messages
- 9,605
- Reaction score
- 3,308
- Points
- 2,117
- Age
- 54
We all love a good upgrade just don’t tell the wifeYes and cost us all more money changing kit again !.
We all love a good upgrade just don’t tell the wifeYes and cost us all more money changing kit again !.
We all love a good upgrade just don’t tell the wife
I have heard that 3D on TV is way more better than on a projector/ theater.I've only just bought the ZD9 recently used so have only looked briefly at the 3D, once I turned off motionflow it looked half decent and much better than reports I had read. Obviously not as good as 3D on a projector though.
I'm not a fan of the cinema/theatre, 3D I've no doubt is excellent on something like an LG E6, even on a Samsung plasma I had it was great. But for me sitting at home 10.5 feet away from a 106" screen is where 3D is at !.I have heard that 3D on TV is way more better than on a projector/ theater.
For me it is, I was turned off 3D from my cinema experiences and made a few anti 3D post here till I got a TV with 3D then my opinion flipped 180 and this is on a QLED not a OLED which I believe even better and would buy a OLED set the next time if they made one that had 3D. You think with the way tech improves and becomes cheaper that at least each manufacturer include 3D in one series of their TVs.I have heard that 3D on TV is way more better than on a projector/ theater.
For me 3D is far more immersive on my 106" projector screen than my 55" TV. Size does matter!I have heard that 3D on TV is way more better than on a projector/ theater.
The last 3D movie I watched in theater was Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation and it was a very bad experience due to lack of brightness. But then I re-watched it on my E6 and it was super fine. Do all home cinema 3D projectors use active shutter glasses? If it is so I don't think it can be better than oled 3D.For me 3D is far more immersive on my 106" projector screen than my 55" TV. Size does matter!
My only experience of 3D at the cinema was Superman Returns at the IMAX in London, only a few scenes were in 3D but they looked amazing. Plenty of depth and in your face pop out. Would be good if those scenes could be included as extras but after all these years I don't see that happening.
Since you own both JVC DLA-X7900 3D Projector and Sony KD-65ZD9 3D TV. What according to you has better 3D handling? 3D on TV or on a projector?I'm not a fan of the cinema/theatre, 3D I've no doubt is excellent on something like an LG E6, even on a Samsung plasma I had it was great. But for me sitting at home 10.5 feet away from a 106" screen is where 3D is at !.
The 3D on the Sony TV better than I expected it to be compared to the W905.Since you own both JVC DLA-X7900 3D Projector and Sony KD-65ZD9 3D TV. What according to you has better 3D handling? 3D on TV or on a projector?
May I ask where you found Hotel Transylvania 3 from in 3D ?.The last 3D movie I watched in theater was Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation and it was a very bad experience due to lack of brightness. But then I re-watched it on my E6 and it was super fine. Do all home cinema 3D projectors use active shutter glasses? If it is so I don't think it can be better than oled 3D.
May I ask where you found Hotel Transylvania 3 from in 3D ?.
Where did you get a copy of HT3 in 3D. I didn’t think it was released anywhere in 3DThe last 3D movie I watched in theater was Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation and it was a very bad experience due to lack of brightness. But then I re-watched it on my E6 and it was super fine. Do all home cinema 3D projectors use active shutter glasses? If it is so I don't think it can be better than oled 3D.
The last 3D movie I watched in theater was Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation and it was a very bad experience due to lack of brightness. But then I re-watched it on my E6 and it was super fine. Do all home cinema 3D projectors use active shutter glasses? If it is so I don't think it can be better than oled 3D.
My first watch of The Force Awakens was on 2D blu ray and I wasn't that impressed, I later purchased the 3D blu ray and it was so much more enjoyable.The discussion about cinema 3D and home 3D is really interesting. Whilst I've had mixed experiences at the cinema with 3D I've never regretted any 3D purchase I've watched on my LG C6 TV.
An example is The Force Awakens which underwhelmed me at the cinema but impressed on TV.
Likewise I was thoroughly disappointed with Avengers Endgame 3D at the cinema but I've just ordered the bluray today (Marvel doing 2 for £18 offer again!) so hoping this is much better at home - I'll let you know! ;-)
I do think that a 3D projector will be my next move though, so thanks to the people posting comments who do have such systems. I will miss passive 3D should it come to that but do believe that the industry will return to 3D TV which ideally will be a 'glasses free'version!!
Order the 3D version too!! Lol, im going for both.My first watch of The Force Awakens was on 2D blu ray and I wasn't that impressed, I later purchased the 3D blu ray and it was so much more enjoyable.
I upgraded my projector over the Christmas period from the Benq W1070 to the Benq W2700. Knowing that I was going to be getting a new projector when I pre-ordered Rise of Skywalker I opted for the UHD version. Really thinking I should have ordered the 3D especially after watching both Guardians of the Galaxy movies in 3D at the weekend. They looked fantastic.
Order the 3D version too!! Lol, im going for both.
For a while HMV did include the 3D with their UHD steelbook releases, I have Spider-man Homecoming and War for the Planet of the Apes. Cost the same at the time as any other UHD steelbook, I wish they had continued doing that.With 3D releases seemingly on the decline, I think the film companies should include a 3D version as a simple bonus disc with their 4K releases. At least that way we could still get 3D if we want it (and with the right television, 3D actually looks far better than 4K) without them having to go to the bother of marketing a separate release. The work in creating the disc master ought to be fairly minimal given that theatrical releases are all digital now.
Andre
4K not doing that well so combining the two could be more viable as you do not have to create two lots of products(as in separate 3D and 4K stock) or carry 2 different sets of stock. And think the pressing and cost of disc minimal although a bigger cost over a run but makes the end product sales worth and can increase the sales.With 3D releases seemingly on the decline, I think the film companies should include a 3D version as a simple bonus disc with their 4K releases. At least that way we could still get 3D if we want it (and with the right television, 3D actually looks far better than 4K) without them having to go to the bother of marketing a separate release. The work in creating the disc master ought to be fairly minimal given that theatrical releases are all digital now.
Andre
I got Aquaman from FNAC with 3D, 4K and even a music disc little more than the Spider-Man Far From Home.For a while HMV did include the 3D with their UHD steelbook releases, I have Spider-man Homecoming and War for the Planet of the Apes. Cost the same at the time as any other UHD steelbook, I wish they had continued doing that.
Typically 4k releases are more expensive than 3D releases however