If a player can only do HDR10 its still going to look fantastic.Im want a player with dolby vision so its not "out dated" inna year will be a Lg dolby vision tv down the line for me.
If a player can only do HDR10 its still going to look fantastic.
When dolby does the mastering they'll have to make the required HDR10 layer look great as well.
It makes sense to wait for DV if your buying a new tv this year.
But I certainly don't consider my EF950V 'outdated'.
Actually thats something I've not read about. Can these hdr formats work with games?Always seen my as a gaming tv.
Actually thats something I've not read about. Can these hdr formats work with games?
I've seen the packing for the new UHD Blu-ray discs and they do make it clear if they support Dolby Vision or not. At the moment Warners, Sony and Universal support it and Fox don't, with Disney and Paramount currently unannounced either way. As far as the look goes, as long as the HD mastering is done carefully and with the content creator's consent, then I don't think anyone will have an issue.It's not ideal if players are launching without support, and it's not clear from the disks themselves which standards they support (its bad enough with the various new audio formats). Also I wonder how many articles we'll see in the future complaining about the look of the remastered films.
Netflix use Dolby Vision, so there will still be the base HDR10 signal which is then augmented by Dolby Vision using metadata.So HDR10 will always be attainable from UHD Blu, but what of Netflix if they only support DV? Is it possible to still display HDR10 on a TV that only supports that?
There's no technical reason why a game couldn't be created in HDR.Actually thats something I've not read about. Can these hdr formats work with games?
I've seen the packing for the new UHD Blu-ray discs and they do make it clear if they support Dolby Vision or not. At the moment Warners, Sony and Universal support it and Fox don't, with Disney and Paramount currently unannounced either way. As far as the look goes, as long as the HD mastering is done carefully and with the content creator's consent, then I don't think anyone will have an issue.
Netflix use Dolby Vision, so there will still be the base HDR10 signal which is then augmented by Dolby Vision using metadata.
Netflix use Dolby Vision, so there will still be the base HDR10 signal which is then augmented by Dolby Vision using metadata.
Yes all HDR capable TVs support HDR10 as a minimum and then some, like LG's new OLEDs, also support Dolby Vision. However, regardless of whether the content uses HDR10 (Fox, Amazon and YouTube) or Dolby Vision (Warners, Sony, Universal and Netflix), the HDR capable TV owner will still get at least the benefit of HDR10 - which looks fantastic.
In fact at the moment there is no TV that can handle a peak brightness higher than 1,000 nits, so none of them can actually take full advantage of Dolby Vision's 4,000 nits of peak brightness. The reason that many content providers are using Dolby Vision is to provide a degree of future-proofing so that the content will remain cutting-edge for a long time.
The other reason that Dolby Vision is proving popular is that it is designed to precisely map the content to the display's capabilities using metadata. HDR10 can also do this but it will depend on how Fox or Amazon decide to implement it, whilst with Dolby Vision it's a fundamental part of the specs.